Carbon Credits Can Reduce Carbon Debt

The idea that is often portrayed in headlines like the one below the carbon credits won't reduce emissions - just reduces the positive work of which carbon-credit programs are capable.

Yes, it is true. However, the tiny voluntary tax that's carbon credits has not had a major effect on the behavior many major emitters, especially when contrasted with the earnings by fossil fuels. It's likely that more accessible renewable energy sources will ultimately have a bigger impact on decreasing our dependence on fossil fuels than taxes.

Today's emissions are a problem. To comprehend the significance of carbon credits however we need to go beyond the Income Statement and examine our Balance Sheet. More specifically, we need to look at our long-term carbon debt.

If Planet Earth maintained a Balancesheet, and we were required to report our basic requirements, like food availability as well as water security, physical security and more. Also, our long Team Debt entries our accrued levels and extreme levels of soil organic carbon depletion due to farms, and the remarkable degree of degrading coastal mangrove forest carbon storage areas, it would be obvious that the current situation was not caused by a single-year's emissions.

Therefore, any headline that mentions carbon offsets is misleading. Climate change's issues are not just due Find out more to carbon emissions but are traceable back to the past (or even centuries). of poor farming practices, massive deforestation, mangrove removal and pollution, and a variety of other crimes.

What's the extent of the extent of damage to mangrove forests? Between 50 and 65 percent of mangrove forests in the world have disappeared or been significantly diminished. In numerous places across the world, farmlands have lost up to 80 percent of their organic soil carbon, to the point where food security could be in danger.

This is the reason it's essential to shift our focus from the triple-bottom line to the credit that is accrued in the balance sheet. Consider carbon credits more as an item of balance sheet adjustments relating to total debt than a tax on today’s emissions. Carbon credits are a (carbon credit) that can be used in order to reduce (carbon) and debt.

How can we reduce this amount of debt?

It's not hard to find the answers. Here's an example. CarbonNation's fund family has established CarbonNation Blue, a CarbonNation Blue fund to help restore and preserve mangroves. These mangrove forests need significant funds to be able to grow. For instance, a 15,000-hectare forest which needs to be replanted could require between USD2,500 to US4,500 for each hectare. Additionally, it will require three years' careful cultivation by the local communities.

To reduce the amount of phosphorus and nitrogen waste generated, the nearby onshore fisheries should be equipped with efficient filtering systems based on algae. This will allow for more nutritious and high-quality produce.

When the forest matures and the plants emerge with carbon credits, they are produced. These carbon credits could be used to pay back the principal amount, as well as a dividend to investors. The benefits are more than simply financial gains. A greater mangrove cover can result in a higher amount of fish. Mangroves protect fish from predators. This is among the main source of revenue for a lot of coastal communities.

Mangroves with more mangroves provide greater protection against the rising tides and erosion of coastal areas. As most people know that mangroves provide up to 50x higher carbon sequestration rates than low-density forests. Yes, machines that pull carbon from air and then store it in the ground are futuristic-looking. But mangroves do this for millions years and also provide us with food.

Fund has secured substantial funding in addition to other partnerships to aid these initiatives. But, partners are always welcome to reach out to the fund.

image

This article was written well. But, the issue I have is the negative tone and the misinformation in the headline. This, based upon the article's text suggests that the editor could have added or changed the headline.